The following article presents a commentary on recent arbitration-related decisions by the Austrian Supreme Court and is the third of an annual contribution that provides readers with a ‘‘Vienna Perspective’’ on issues relevant for international arbitration.
This year we focus on a judgment dealing with the arbitral tribunal decision making process. The Supreme Court clarified the standard applicable to evaluate the sufficiency of deliberations among the arbitrators, the issues to be observed when one arbitrator refuses to sign the award and the consequences of dissenting opinions for the enforcement of the award. In our overview section, we revisit questions of form under Art. IV of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (‘‘New York Convention’’) and can report that the critique voiced in our ‘‘Vienna Perspective – 2010’’ commentary has led to a change in case law.
Alle Angaben auf dieser Website dienen nur der Erstinformation und können keine rechtliche oder sonstige Beratung sein oder ersetzen. Daher übernehmen wir keine Haftung für allfälligen Schadenersatz.
The material contained in this website is provided for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal or other professional advice. We accept no responsibility for loss which may arise from reliance on information contained on this site.